بسم الله
الرحمن الرحيم
Questions:
Agencies reported that a meeting took place between the Pakistani officials & their Afghani counterparts which was also attended by the leaders of the tribes on Tuesday, 28th October, 2008 C.E. It reported that the participants agreed to pursue contacts with the Taliban militias.
Agencies reported that a meeting took place between the Pakistani officials & their Afghani counterparts which was also attended by the leaders of the tribes on Tuesday, 28th October, 2008 C.E. It reported that the participants agreed to pursue contacts with the Taliban militias.
Does this mean that they will
initiate contacts with the Taliban or that they are already in touch? Where
will these contacts lead to? Would it result in the US withdrawal from
Afghanistan, an end to America's hold there and the Taliban's return to power?
Or whether it implies that the Taliban will gradually share power either
directly or indirectly and become loyal to the US?
Answer:
Before we attempt to answer the question, it is necessary to comprehend the following issues:
First: The reported
meeting could not have taken place without the approval of the United States,
which means that the US had sponsored the talks. This is because it was attended
by its principal ‘players’, i.e. the governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Even the tribal leaders who participated in the talks were not hostile to the
two governments. Further especially becasue this meeting took place in
Islamabad and it is an open secret that both the regimes in Pakistan &
Afghanistan are fully loyal to America.
Secondly: The
United States is in a real mess in Afghanistan, ot can neither consolidate
peace there despite the presence of over 30,000 allied troops of the NATO. What
has further added to America’s problems is the fact that it's allies have
refused to send any additional troops and even those who agreed to reinforce
the troops have only announced sending of an insignificant and insufficient
number. Moreover, there are those who in response the American requests for
additional troops, announced their intentions to actually withdraw! The
Canadian Prime Minister for instance has declared its intentions to withdraw
its troops. In fact the statement of the commander of the British forces
reflected his rejoicing at the cost of the US when ruled out a decisive victory
in Afghanistan! General Peter Wool, the Operations chief of the British Forces
in Afghanistan warned recently against sending additional troops and substantiating
his stance, he testified before the Parliamentary Committee on Defense that the
proposal for additional forces for Afghanistan was a ‘misleading‘ proposal.
Similarly the German authorities announced reduction in its forces instead of
sending additional troops. The leftist politicians in Germany have demanded an
end to German Special Forces participation in the Operation Enduring Freedom in
Afghanistan.
Thus the United States is caught in
a real security crisis in Afghanistan, and this is an undeniable reality. Even
Karzai himself stated on 30th October, 2008 C.E: "We have achieved some
successes, but we have failed to secure peace which is one of the most
important requirement for the country, and our highways are not safe when one cannot
safely travel by car from Kandahar in the south to Herat in the west, or even travel
between Kabul to Bakita which is only a 100 kms south of the capital".
These comments of Karzai were addressed to gathering of women and reported by
Reuters.
Thirdly: The Taliban are
fierce fighters and they control most of the strategic points in Afghanistan by
virtue of which they enjoy a position of considerable strength. But on the
other hand, from the perspective of political insight, their position is weak,
and it is very conspicuously so. They once ruled Afghanistan and strongly
attached to Musharraf's Pakistan. It was then questioned as to how they could
be so aligned to Pakistan which was so completely loyal to America. They were
asked why they were not afraid that America could attack them through Pakistan?
They presumed that their relations with Pakistan, although loyal to the US,
will both harm them, rather they considered this to be beneficial to their
interests! It anyway soon became clear that Musharraf allowed Pakistan's land
and airspace as launch-pad for US attacks on Taliban authority in Afghanistan
and spelt its doom.
These three factors must be borne in
mind in order to fully comprehend the situation resulting from the meetings,
contacts and discussions with the Taliban which are now an open secret. These
meetings are not clandestine, rather they are in the open and Karzai himself,
the Afghani ambassador to the UN and the Saudi Foreign Minister have made
announcements about them in the run up to the latest meeting on 30th October,
2008 C.E which was held in Islamabad.
Further, the Taliban, despite their
vowed statements that they will not enter into negotiations while Afghanistan
was under occupation, have not denied their meetings with the Karzai government
though they do not term these discussions as negotiations or political
dialogue! They simply refer to these meetings as dinner meetings! Abdus salam
Za'eef, Taliban Ambassador to Pakistan clarified to the Reuters agency that
certain Taliban elements travelled to Saudi Arabia last month and met the Saudi
King and some Afghan government officials. He asserted that there were some 15
or 16 persons and some 7 or 8 former officials of the Taliban movement who met
the Saudi King Abdullah but during this meeting they did not discuss or
negotiate any political issue involving Afghanistan. Wakeel Ahmed Mutawakkil,
the former Talibani foreign minister said: "there were no peace talks
with the Afghan government in Saudi Arabia last month despite the presence of
Afghan government officials in Saudia and there was no representative of the
Taliban. It was merely a general meeting over dinner....”
Although the US did try to conceal
the actual facts, some details were published in the media which indicated one
way or another that America did not wish the entire picture to emerge. The Wall
Street Journal reported on the day the said meeting, i.e. on 30th October, 2008
C.E that the United States was considering participating in discussions with
elements of the Taliban, the journal added that a new US approach was finalised
in the draft recommendation during assessment of the secret White House
strategy in Afghanistan. The Wall Street Journal asserted that the US will
actively participate in the dialogue. This was reported on the website of the
journal.
To conclude, meetings did take place
and are continuing and the Islamabad meeting announced the agreement to pursue
dialogue with the Taliban. As they have mentioned the next meeting is scheduled
in the upcoming 2 or 3 months in Kabul.
As to where would these contacts
lead to? Would they result in America withdrawing from Afghanistan and an end
to its hegemony there, leading to the return of Taliban to power? Or is it the
gradual neighing of the Taliban's participation in a pro-US regime either
directly or through proxy?
The plain answer to this is that the
United States wants to emerge out of this mess in Afghanistan as well as Iraq
after suffering severe losses in the two countries, especially since her allies
have begun to express their utter displeasure and uneasiness to remain
embroiled in Afghanistan only to suffer enormous losses. Moreover, fighting has
been intensified in Waziristan & other tribal regions of Pakistan and hence
building bridges with the Taliban may perhaps bring respite for America and her
allies in Pakistan. But at the same time the US wants its allied government in
Afghanistan to be a part of the dialogue & agreement so that it can protect
its interests and influence and thus breathe in safety & security...this is
why the US has deputed its agents in Pakistan & Afghanistan as the negotiating
parties in the carrot & stick negotiations with the Taliban.
The Taliban started their fighting
with the US-led occupation forces with the aim of cleansing their land and
ruled their land free form the influence of the Kufr states led by America. Now
their entering into negotiations in like treading into uncharted territory
unlike for America & its agents Pakistan & Afghanistan. It is
apprehended that the Taliban may be cheated and misled in the negotiations by
the mixture of America's carrot & stick policy. The Taliban may consider
Pakistan & Afghanistan as being different from America and harbour goodwill
for them!
Taliban's entry into negotiations
with the agents of America in Pakistan & Afghanistan and especially
sponsored by the Saudi rulers will plausibly make them think well of their
intentions due to their self-claimed proximity to Islam. But the truth is that
these rulers are loyal to the West and this loyalty weighs more prominently to
them than their sincerity or closeness to Islam. We can say that Taliban's
entry into the maze of negotiations would most certainly lead them down the
path of giving away ground and concessions irrespective of whether these
meetings are called as negotiations, dialogue, dinner talks or any other
nomenclature, they are simply negotiations & concessations and nothing
else. The above referred statements of the former Taliban ambassador &
Foreign minister substantiate this, they both acknowledged that the meetings
did take place but they did not refer to these talks as negotiations! These are
mere semantics & euphemisms in order to make the whole process more
palatable.
In conclusion, the Taliban's entry
into dialogue with America either directly or indirectly and that too before
the US troops withdrawal would lead to a gradual participation of Taliban in a
pro-US regime, either on its own or through proxy.
We pray to Allah (swt) that the Taliban do not fall prey
into such negotiations and are not cheated & misled by the allurement of
the carrot & stick policy presented to them. We hope that they will
consider the Pakistani & Afghani officials just as they look upon the US.
We also hope that the Taliban fully comprehend that the US is inextricably
caught in this security maze and they are able to fully harness the situation
to their advantage and not be cheated into them in the guise of negotiations.
Or,
See this
Link
No comments:
Post a Comment