4.12.16

লিফলেটঃ হে মুসলিমগণ! রোহিঙ্গা মুসলিমদের রক্ষা করার একমাত্র উপায় হচ্ছে - আরাকানকে মুক্ত করতে খিলাফতের নেতৃত্বের অধীনে আমাদের সেনাবাহিনীকে জিহাদে প্রেরণ করা

বিসমিল্লাহির রাহমানির রাহিম

হে মুসলিমগণ! রোহিঙ্গা মুসলিমদের রক্ষা করার একমাত্র উপায় হচ্ছে
আরাকানকে মুক্ত করতে খিলাফতের নেতৃত্বের অধীনে আমাদের সেনাবাহিনীকে জিহাদে প্রেরণ করা

মিয়ানমার সরকার একদিকে যেমন রোহিঙ্গা মুসলিমদের উপর হত্যাকান্ড, ধর্ষণ, অঙ্গহানী ও অগ্নিসংযোগের মতো নৃসংশতা চালাচ্ছে আর অন্যদিকে বাংলাদেশের নিষ্ঠুর হাসিনা সরকার তাদেরকে আশ্রয় না দিয়ে এবং তাদেরকে বন্দুকের নলের মুখে পুশব্যাক করে হত্যাকারীদের কাছে ফেরত পাঠিয়ে এই গণহত্যায় সহযোগীর ভূমিকা পালন করছে এবং আল্লাহ্ সুবহানাহু ওয়া তা’আলার নির্দেশের তোয়াক্কা করেনি

“অবশ্য যদি তারা দ্বীনের ব্যাপারে তোমাদের সাহায্য কামনা করে, তবে তাদের সাহায্য করা তোমাদের কর্তব্য [সূরা আল-আনফা’লঃ ৭২]

সরকার তার ঘৃণ্য পদক্ষেপের পক্ষে সাফাই গেয়ে বলছে যে, এসব অসহায় জনগণ নাকি জাতীয় নিরাপত্তার জন্য হুমকি! কিসের জাতি? কিসের জাতীয় নিরাপত্তা? যখন রাসূলুল্লাহ্ (সাঃ) বলেছেনঃ “মুসলিমরা অন্যান্য জাতিদের থেকে পৃক এবং এক উম্মাহ্।” জাতিরাষ্ট্র নামক চিন্তা একটি কুফর চিন্তা। ইসলাম জাতীয়তাবাদকে নিষিদ্ধ করেছে; ইসলামে এমন চিন্তার কোনো স্থান নাই যে চিন্তা মুসলিমদের জাতীয়তার ভিত্তিতে বিভক্ত করে রাখে, আলাদা আলাদা রাষ্ট্রের ভিত্তিতে, কোনোটা বাঙালীদের জন্য, কোনোটা পাকিস্তানীদের জন্য, কোনোটা আবার সিরিয়ান কিংবা জর্ডানীদের জন্য, ইত্যাদি মুসলিমরা এক উম্মাহ্, তাদের রাষ্ট্র এক, তাদের ভূ-খন্ড এক, তাদের যুদ্ধ এক এবং তাদের শান্তিও এক তাই উদাহরণস্বরূপ যখন আফগানিস্তানের মুসলিমরা শত্রু দ্বারা আক্রান্ত হবে তখন পাকিস্তানের মুসলিমদের তাদের রক্ষায় এগিয়ে আসতে হবে ঠিক একইভাবে, যখন আরাকানের মুসলিমরা আজ আক্রান্ত তখন বাংলাদেশের মুসলিমদের তাদের রক্ষায় এগিয়ে আসতে হবে

যাইহোক, সরকার কর্তৃক “জাতীয় নিরাপত্তা রক্ষার” বুলি প্রকৃতপক্ষে জনগণের সাথে প্রতারণা ছাড়া আর কিছুই না খুব বেশীদিন গত হয়নি যখন শেখ হাসিনা কাশ্মির ইস্যুতে পাকিস্তানের বিপক্ষে ভারতকে সমর্থনের ঘোষণা দিয়েছিল তখন জাতীয় নিরাপত্তার কোন বিবেচনা থেকে সে তা বলেছিল? প্রকৃত সত্য হচ্ছে হাসিনা সরকার ইসলাম এবং মুসলিমদের শত্রু সে এবং তার সরকার দেশের অভ্যন্তরে ইসলাম এবং মুসলিমদের বিরুদ্ধে যুদ্ধ করছে সুতরাং তাদের পক্ষে রোহিঙ্গা মুসলিমদেরকে শত্রুদের হাতে তুলে দেয়া অপ্রত্যাশিত কিছু নয়

হে মুসলিমগণ!

আপনাদের রোহিঙ্গা মুসলিম ভাই-বোনদের উদ্ধার ও রক্ষা করতে হলে শত্রু রাষ্ট্র মিয়ানমারের সরকার ও হিংস্র বৌদ্ধ ভিক্ষুদের কবল হতে আরাকানকে মুক্ত করতে হবে এবং সেই লক্ষ্যে খিলাফতের নেতৃত্বের অধীনে বাংলাদেশ সেনাবাহিনীকে জিহাদে প্রেরণ করতে হবে সরকারের নিকট সাহায্যে এগিয়ে আসার দাবী জানিয়ে সমাবেশ করে কোনো লাভ নেই এই সরকারের (কিংবা জাতিসংঘ বা আন্তর্জাতিক সম্প্রদায়ের) নিকট দাবী জানানোর পরিবর্তে সামরিক বাহিনীর অফিসারদের নিকট দাবী জানান, যেন তারা এই সরকারকে অপসারণ করে খিলাফত প্রতিষ্ঠায় হিযবুত তাহরীর-এর নিকট ক্ষমতা হস্তান্তর করে আপনাদের আয়োজিত সমাবেশ ও মিছিলগুলো থেকে এই দাবী তুলে আপনাদের দায়িত্ব পালন করুন আপনাদের দাবী হতে হবে সেনানিবাসগুলোর প্রতি, সরকারের প্রতি নয় আপনাদের পরিচিত সেনাঅফিসারগণ যারা আপনাদের পরিবারের সদস্য, আত্মীয় কিংবা বন্ধু, তাদের নিকটও এই দাবী পৌঁছে দিতে হবে তাদের সঙ্গে সাক্ষাৎ করুন, তাদের উপর চাপ সৃষ্টি করুন যেন তারা দ্রুত পদক্ষেপ গ্রহণ করে খিলাফত প্রতিষ্ঠাই স্বমূলে এই সমস্যার সমাধান করবে এবং এটাই একমাত্র কার্যকর স্থায়ী সমাধান নয়তো আগ্রাসনকারীরা বারবার তাদের খেয়ালখুশি মতো আগ্রাসন চালাতে থাকবে আর এখানকার অন্ধ-বধির-বোবা সরকার এসব অসহায়দেরকে হত্যাকারীদের হাতে তুলে দিবে অতীতে আমরা এমনটাই প্রত্যক্ষ করেছি যেমনটি বর্তমানে করছি

রাসূলুল্লাহ্ (সাঃ) বলেছেনঃ

“ইমাম (খলিফা) হচ্ছেন সেই ঢাল যার পেছনে মুসলিমরা জিহাদ করে এবং নিজেদেরকে রক্ষা করে [সহীহ্ মুসলিম]

খিলাফত রাষ্ট্র হচ্ছে একমাত্র রাষ্ট্র যা মুসলিমদের সর্বদা নিরাপত্তা প্রদান করেছে এবং করবে এই অঞ্চলের ইতিহাসে আপনাদের কাছে রয়েছে তার একটি গৌরবোজ্জ্বল দৃষ্টান্ত ৭১১ খ্রিস্টাব্দে, সিংহল হতে একদল মুসলিম বণিক যখন ভারত মহাসাগরে সিন্দু উপকূলে নোঙর ফেলে, তখন তাদের জাহাজ লুট করা হয় এবং তাদেরকে আটক করে বন্দী করা হয় এই খবর যখন খিলাফতের রাজধানীতে পৌঁছায় তখন খলিফা ওয়ালিদ বিন আবদুল মালিক তার গভর্ণর হাজ্জাজ বিন ইউসূফকে এই নির্দেশ প্রদান করেন যেন তিনি সিন্দের হিন্দু শাসকের নিকট থেকে ক্ষতিপূরণ আদায় এবং মুসলিমদের মুক্ত করেন উম্মাহ্’র শ্রেষ্ঠ সন্তানদের একজন, তরুন মুসলিম জেনারেল, মুহাম্মদ বিন কাসিমের নেতৃত্বে একটি সেনাবাহিনীকে দ্রুত প্রেরণ করা হয় খলিফার সেনাবাহিনী যখন দিবাল নামক (বর্তমান করাচির নিকটস্থ) স্থানে পোঁছায়, তখন মুহাম্মদ বিন কাসিম রাজা দাহিরের নিকট তার দাবী উপস্থাপন করেন রাজা তার বিরোধীতা করে এবং মুসলিমদের নিকট পরাজিত হয় এবং রাজ্য হারায় এই ঘটনা তখন ফাতেহ্ আল-হিন্দের অর্থাৎ হিন্দ বিজয়ের পটভূমিতে পরিণত হয় হায়! হাসিনা সরকার আমাদের সেই ইতিহাসের কতই না বিপরীতে অবস্থান নিয়েছে, যে কিনা মুসলিমদের সাগরে নিক্ষেপ করছে, হত্যাকারীদের হাতে অর্পণ করছে!

হে বাংলাদেশ সেনাবাহিনীর নিষ্ঠাবান অফিসারগণ!

রাসূলুল্লাহ্ (সাঃ) একদা তাওয়াফরত অবস্থায় কা’বাকে উদ্দেশ্য করে বলেনঃ

“...কতোই না তোমার সম্মান, কতোই না তোমার মর্যাদা! কিন্তু যেই সত্ত্বার হাতে মুহাম্মদের প্রাণ তাঁর কসম, আল্লাহর নিকট একজন ঈমানদারের রক্ত ও সম্পদ তোমার মর্যাদার তুলনায় অনেক বেশী!” [ইমাম আল-মুনদিরি কর্তৃক তারগীব ওয়া’ল তারহিব-এ বর্ণিত, ৩/২৭৬]

আপনাদের দায়িত্ব হচ্ছে মুসলিমদের রক্ত ও সম্পদের এই মর্যাদাকে রক্ষা করা অবিলম্বে এই সরকারকে অপসারণ করুন এবং আমাদের নিকট ক্ষমতা হস্তান্তর করুন; হিযবুত তাহরীর-এর সম্মানিত আমির খলিফা পদে অধিষ্ঠিত হবেন এবং আপনাদের ভাই-বোনদের মুক্ত করতে আপনাদেরকে জিহাদে নেতৃত্ব দিবেন আপনারা কি আপনাদের নির্যাতিত ভাই-বোনদের কান্না শুনতে পাননা? তাদের রক্তাক্ত অবস্থা এবং ধ্বংসস্তুপ কি আপনাদের চোখে পড়েনা? তাদের নিদারুন কষ্ট দেখে আপনাদের হৃদয়ে কি রক্তক্ষরণ হয়না? তাদের অসহায় মুখগুলো দেখে আপনাদের কি একটুও দয়া হয়না, একটুও মায়া হয়না? আমরা জানি নিঃসন্দেহে আপনারা তাদের ভালোবাসেন, তাদের ব্যাথা হৃদয়ে অনুভব করেন এবং তাদের দুঃখ-কষ্ট প্রত্যক্ষ করছেন এবং তাদের আত্মচিৎকার শুনছেন সুতরাং, নিজের সাথে বিশ্বাসঘাতকতা করবেন না কিংবা নিজের সাথে প্রতারণা করে মিথ্যা অজুহাত দিয়ে বলবেন না যে আপনাকে সংবিধানের প্রতি আনুগত্যশীল থাকতে হবে এবং শুধুমাত্র সরকার কর্তৃক প্রদত্ত দায়িত্ব পালন করতে হবে এই সংবিধানের মূল্য এক টুকরো লিখিত কাগজের চেয়ে বেশী কিছু নয়, সরকার যে কিনা তা প্রণয়ন করেছে, সেও এর তোয়াক্কা করে না সরকারের শিকল ছিন্ন করে নিজেকে মুক্ত করুন, যে কিনা আপনাদেরকে জাতিসংঘের শান্তিরক্ষা মিশনের নামে দূরবর্তী দেশসমূহে প্রেরণ করে, অথচ আপনাদের পার্শ্ববর্তী দেশের ভাই-বোনদের রক্ষায় নীরব থাকে ফলাফল বা পরিণতির ভয়ে আর ভীত থাকবেন না, আল্লাহ্ সুবহানাহু ওয়া তা’আলার উপর ভরসা রাখুন, ইনশা’আল্লাহ্ আপনারাই সফলকাম হবেন

“এবং যে ব্যক্তি আল্লাহর উপর ভরসা রাখে, তার জন্যে তিনিই যথেষ্ট নিঃসন্দেহে, আল্লাহ্ তাঁর উদ্দেশ্য পরিপূর্ণ করবেন নিশ্চয়ই, আল্লাহ্ সবকিছুর জন্য একটি পরিমাণ ধার্য করে রেখেছেন [সূরা আত-ত্বলাকঃ ৩]

হে আল্লাহ্! এদেশের সেনাঅফিসারদের মধ্য হতে এমন কিছু সাহসী পুরুষের উত্থান ঘটান যেন তারা আমাদের এই আহ্বানকে সাদরে গ্রহণ করে এবং আমাদের অসহায় ভাই-বোনদেরকে শত্রুর এবং আমাদেরকে যালিম হাসিনার যুলুমের কবল থেকে মুক্ত করে আমিন!


২৯ সফর, ১৪৩৮ হিজরী
২৯ নভেম্বর, ২০১৬ খ্রিস্টাব্দ

হিযবুত তাহরীর, উলাই’য়াহ্ বাংলাদেশ

1.12.16

The importance of independent thinking & grasping the culture

The importance of independent thinking & grasping the culture

The following is a transcript of a session delivered by a brother.

It is possible that sometimes there is a deficiency in some of the Da’wah carriers. This weakness is in understanding the culture and the way we study in the Halaqaat and also the general reading and discussions, these results in problems in the Da’wah.

When the general culture level of the Da’wah carriers becomes weak, it creates a number of problems and has dangerous consequences.

When the Halaqat are not given in the same level as originally intended by the pioneers of the Da’wah and when the cultural level is weak, each resulting Halaqah will create a new halaqah of a new generation of Da’wah carriers that are culturally weaker that its predecessor, the thoughts and culture become watered down and diluted losing the original pure taste of the concepts.

Although activity of the Da’wah is essential, it is important to understand that our Da’wah is not ‘activity-driven’ rather it should be driven by a productive and independent thinking based on a strong mentality and strong all-round culture.

Sometimes, we are extremely busy in organising activities and doing a lot of running around. So we use our time in organising events and programmes and then we often busy meeting people to invite them to the events we organise. However, sometimes whilst we are planning and organising these events, weather looking for venues or the like, we do not question the objectives of the activity that we are busy organising. So we become labourers for the Da’wah rather than carriers of the Da’wah. Where we have no time to develop our thinking and deepen our cultural level.

As a result, the activities of Da’wah would slow down after the energy our zeal depletes and we would have not achieved results in the Da’wah.

Whereas, on the opposite hand, if we build ourselves with deeper culture and strong independent thinking that we strongly believe in rather than borrowing from others, this will build the Da’wah carriers to be strong in their mentalities and result in more productive activities that driven by concepts rather than enthusiasm and zeal.

This does not mean we incline to the other extreme where we only think and culture ourselves without any result. So on the other hand, there may be those who would be the first to criticise styles even though they could see the apparent achievement of results from them. This mentality would make the adherents of it comparable to the one who continuously ponders about battle and reads the books of war but never engages in the battle himself and is thus defeated by the enemy.

It would make us intellectuals rather than Da’wah carriers, thinkers rather than politicians, the drive for the Da’wah would slowly become eroded and the passion to rid the world of evil would weaken.

We must realise that the issue of the Da’wah is one of urgency and one that requires for us to move from sensing the problems, thinking about the best solution for it in relation to the styles and then to apply that solution. Even if that solution is not one that we can definitely say is the purest or definitely the best out of hundreds of possible styles.

However that style would be the best one we could think of and one we can see affecting the reality which we face in a positive way.

This does not mean that we leave thinking, rather it means we think in deeply about achieving the result in the best way without allowing that thought to continue for centuries before even considering action.

In order for us to explain the importance and significance of this subject, I shall start by asking you a few questions:

What is the meaning of Revival without answering intellectual elevation?

Someone may ask why are we not concentrating all of our efforts Da’wah to non-Muslims? As they may argue that RasulAllah’s (saw) method of establishing Dar al Islam in Makkan Era was by converting people to Islam?

What is the meaning of Sunnah? Does it mean we must follow the Prophet (saw) in the way we dress, the length of our beards etc?

Sometimes we may not be able to answer questions that we have never faced before for example; we say the Quran has four possibilities of origin-Arab, Non-Arab, Mohammed (saw) or Allah (swt). What if someone came and suggested that they be lived Shaytan is another possibility and he wrote the Quran? How many of us would know how to answer that?

If any of us are hesitant in answering these questions, then this subject is absolutely vital for us to address.

In order to create a strong affect in the Da’wah that will create change in people and not to fall into weakness. It is important to understand the different types of thought and to build independent thinking at least.

The types of thinking:

1.     Dependent thought
2.     Independent thought
3.     Creative thought

Three types of thinking exist amongst people: independent, creative and dependent. The Da’wah carrier must possess independent thinking at least and the leaders should have creative thinking.

Dependent thinking is when people imitate others thoughts and adopt them without questioning deeply.

Dependent thinking exists in the person of low intellect who imitates others and mimics and borrows their thought. So a dependent thinker would have no original thought but sheer dependency on the one he has adopted from.

In reality the dependent thinker adopts concepts on this basis rather than realising their truth and conformity with the reality or the shari’ah texts.

This type of thinking becomes exposed when the individual is confronted with questions or realities that necessitate a reply or the application of the concept. When questioned by others on a concept he has imitated, he often gets stuck not knowing what to say if questions are slightly deeper or unexpected. In this case the dependent thinker would be unable to answer questions related to the concept independently unless he borrowed the answers from someone else.

If faced with a reality that required the application of the concept he would be unable to apply it and would inevitably resort to seeking assistance or attempt avoiding the issue.

In this situation, the individual will adopt already-existing ideas established by others when faced with any case or issue that requires any type of original thought or research. Whether in political, legal or any other issues, such a person will turn to others to provide him with the answers and after taking the answer or opinion from others, he will defend and justify this opinion as if it was his own without researching the related evidences, only because of his trust in the one who established the opinion.

Can be in issues related to understanding reality and text shari’ah matters.

So for example; the role of the mind, Existence of Creator, proof of Qur’an or Shari’ah textual matters like method of re-restablishing Khilafah, understanding of Usul (Ijtihad and Taqleed), Qat’I and Dhan’i matters.

There are many consequences of having dependent or borrowed thinking. These could be weakness in our discussions with different sections of the Ummah – whether general people, Ulema, intellectuals, students and people from other groups. The culture that we have gone through and studied is acquired to a basic level that has no depth. This often leads to some of us to get stuck in our arguments and this slows down the Da’wah, where we may need to depend on others to discuss on our behalf.

Because of the imitation, dependency and the lack of thinking and creativity, sometimes our thinking was reduced to a personalized type of thinking that became connected with personalities and not ideas.

Unfortunately, nowadays the idea carries no value unless it is connected to a well-established or high-ranking personality such as a Scholar or Intellectual and any existing research in this case will focus on the person and not the thought so the discussion will emphasize "Who said what" rather than "What is being said". Any person who opposes the opinions of such personalities will be attacked severely.

At the end, the individual will view the correct idea as the idea that comes from a personality that he respects and the wrong idea is the idea that comes from a person that he does not respect and the only way to explain the fallacy of any idea in this context will be to focus the discussion on the personalities.

Such an approach indicates the lack of thinking among Muslims. When the Muslims had a high level of understanding, they would evaluate the personalities based on the ideas they carried and not vice versa. Ali (ra) used to say: "Recognize the truth first; then, you will be able to recognize the people who adhere to the truth.”

So even amongst ourselves, we live in a society that is dominated by imitating personalities and dependent thinking and borrowing thoughts and concepts from people.

Therefore we must be careful not fall into the trap, but break free from this in society and Da’wah. So we should not accept everything just because it was written by this Sheikh or that Sheikh, but rather we should try to question the ideas as much as possible, so we truly become the master of the concept.

Therefore, the entire discussion should focus on the issues and the ideas where the evidence and not a personality, serves as the reference. Only through independent thinking and encouraging the sound and original research can we break free of this imitation.

Independent thinking is adopting concepts on their basis rather than adopting on the basis of trust in another person culture or thought.

An Independent thinker is someone who will not adopt a thought unless he questions it and debates it, then he adopts it. Once he adopts it, he believes in his thought like he is the owner and originator of the thought. So he will be confident to discuss and carry it, debate it and be ready to apply his thoughts on multiple realities weather old or new.

An independent thinker would not get stuck often when he discusses with people in the Da’wah, whether the person who he discusses with those who will challenge his thinking, whether the person is a Sheikh, Alim, Ph.d, member of other group or lecturer and if he were to get stuck or he comes across something new, the independent thinker would recognise gaps in some aspects of his culture, after discussion, questioning, reading, he would work to fill these gaps.

How does someone acquire and develop Independent thinking?

A da’wah carrier who wishes to become independent in his thinking would not be satisfied with just going to a weekly Halaqah and listening to the mushrif for a few hours without questioning him deeply in the concepts he discusses. Sometimes, we may understand what the brother explains to us at the time, but as soon as the halaqah has ended we would not be able to explain the concepts we discussed, so we have not digested the culture and not adopted it independently.

The independent thinker would not stop and be satisfied to move on to the next paragraph unless he understands the idea like his own. Questioning until all possibilities are clarified in order to make someone the owner of the thought rather borrowing the thought.

Practical steps that could be implemented amongst the brothers in order to generate Da’wah carrier with Independent thinking.

It is important that the Mushrifeen push the Dariseen in their level of thinking. The Da’wah carriers should question each other and the mode of doing an action or accepting a thought because a senior brother says so should be dispelled. Rather, the Da’wah carriers should engage in cultural discussions among themselves and debate among each other to produce an atmosphere of culture and independent thinking whether on intellectual, political or legislative matters.

Reading and studying, discussing and self-scrutinising from sources such as the adopted books of the group you are working with is essential. However, that is not enough to develop deep culture. It is absolutely essential that the Da’wah carriers refer to other sources including the general Islamic culture, such as the books of tafseer, ulum al hadith, Usul, aqeedah etc. Also follow political matters as our Da’wah is purely political and other such fields.

Thinking about possibilities to challenge the concept which a da’wah carrier adopts to gain overall and complete strength in what he carries.

Natural discussions with people in the Da’wah, this will naturally push us to think independently and once we discuss, if we feel our discussion is weak, we should try to go back stronger and alone to challenge, not just to take someone who we believe can be better to discuss, as long as this does not harm the Da’wah.

Question your mushrifeen as much as possible until the concept becomes absolutely crystal and your understanding has depth.

Questioning how and why is the way to attain depth

It is absolutely essential that we build our Aqliya strongly.

Aqliya is the fundamental basis were we rewire all our thoughts to. This should only be one basis and that is the basis of the Islamic Aqeedah, none of our thoughts should be rewired to a number of bases, rather a single basis only.

For example, someone who believes that Democracy should be a way forward or believes that there should exist Nation-States, but also believes selling alcohol is Haram or praying 5 times a day is Fard. This person is rewiring his thoughts on these matters to an Islamic Basis on some matters and to other matters a non Islamic basis. He does not possess the Islamic Aqliya, it is incorrect and contradictory to our deen.

Whereas the person who watches the news and sees the occupation of Palestine and believes the solution is not peace with Israel, but the establishment of an Islamic Khilafah and he believes that Salah if Fard like Fasting and believe alcohol is forbidden and believe the way Men and women come together is by contract of Nikah and all of his other thoughts have a single basis and reference point, then this person has an Islamic Aqliya.

Therefore we must possess an Islamic Aqliya, thereby refering each and every single one of our thoughts to a single basis-the Islamic Aqeeda and nothing more.

However, what we wish to address today is the aspects of the Aqliya.

The Aqliya is one basis, which is the Islamic Aqeedah and we as Islamic personalities do use any other basis to refer our concepts back to.

However, from this Islamic ‘Aqliya, we face many realities in our Da’wah and daily lives which requires us to use different aspects of the Aqliya.

Aspects of the Aqliya – Intellectual, legislative, political and structural – need to develop on all areas to be all-round Da’wah carriers.

The intellectual aspect of the Aqliya deals with matters related to ration aspect we face in the Da’wah and our lives, like the deep thoughts of our culture, the definitions and applications of these concepts in real life. Why people think in a certain way, why people judge and hold certain ideas, why people behave in a certain manner and the like. This is a critical aspect to have in our mentality.

The political aspect of the Aqliya is used when we look at local, regional and international events and we conclude and make analysis based on these events with the knowledge and previous information we have gained from the culture to be able to deal with societal and political problems in the world and give solutions for these and mould the Ummah, so we look after their affairs. How would it be possible for the one who wishes to take care of the affairs of the Ummah to not have a Political aspect to his Islamic Aqliya?

The Legislative aspect of the mentality is knowing the Ahkam Shari’ah on most matters we deal with whether they are rituals, social, economic, political, judicial matters and to always refer to the Shari’ah texts to conclude whether the action is Fard, Mandoob, Mubah, makrooh or Haram. It also includes understanding the daleel and usuli principles related to the ahkam. It is necessary for to convey the ahkam together with the evidence especially for our adopted thoughts which are necessary to revive the Ummah. Without having a legislative aspect in our Islamic Aqliya, we would not be able to seek the pleasure of Allah without being dependent on others to give their opinions on these legislative issues.

The Structural aspect of the personality – is about Da’wah, which includes ourselves, the party or group we are with and the work with the Ummah – it defines that we wish to progress in the field of Da’wah with a clear objective with the desire to succeed for the pleasure of Allah (swt), so we may not fail or become lazy or incompetent or to be walking books and intellectual philosophers. This is the most important aspect from all the aspects of the Islamic mentality as without the structural aspect, there would be no goal, no objectives and no vision to create change in the Ummah. Without the structural aspect of the Islamic aqliya, we could all possess good ability to do political analysis or know definitions of concepts and even to know all the details of Fiqh and its usul, tafseer and Ahadith, but it would lead the Da’wah carrier nowhere as he would have no vision and objective and he would just end up becoming a good writer, thinker, philosopher or sheikh, but not a Da’wah carrier.

Therefore it is important that we as Da’wah carriers, try our best to become all-rounder and develop strong aspects to our Islamic Aqliya, become Independent thinkers and possess strong culture, this would lead us to become valuable Da’wah carriers and to achieve better results.



Abu Sa'd al-Babari & Abu Ismael

29.11.16

Q&A: Disputed Classification of Weak Ahadith among the Hadith Scholars

Disputed Classification of Weak Ahadith among the Hadith Scholars

Question: As-Salam Alaikum, I am an Egyptian and this is the first time I visit your website. I am confused about some previous information and when I read your answers to some of the questions, more confusions surfaced, so will you have patience and hear them out, thank you.

“Both Hadiths are not free of disputes, this is why some scholars of Hadith classified it as weak, but we regard it as Hassan Hadith, because it was mentioned in the Fiqh Books and they referred to it when extracting rules”

This statement was mentioned in the answer of Sheikh Abu Al-Rashtah regarding the Hadith of “my companions are like stars”. To my knowledge it is the Muhadiths (scholars of Hadiths) who classify a Hadith. My question is:  Is it possible that a Hadith can be classified as Sahih by the Fiqh but as Mawdoo’ (subject) for example according to the Muhadith?

By Mahmoud Ahmed

Answer:

Wa Alaikum As-Salam Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakatuhu

It seems that you were confused when you read our answer regarding the Hadith of “my companions are like stars” and you thought that the Muhadiths can classify a Hadith as weak but the Faqihs can classify it as Hassan, but this is not the case, if the Muhadiths agree that a Hadith is weak, then the Faqihs do not classify it as Hassan.

My brother, the issue is regarding a weak Hadith that the scholars of Hadith disputed in its classification as weak, some would consider it as weak and cannot be used as evidence, while others approve it as evidence. This is because some narrators are considered as trustworthy by some Muhadiths, but are considered as not trustworthy by others or that the narrators are considered as unknown by some Muhadiths, but as well-known by others. Also some Hadiths are taken as Sahih from a chain but as not Sahih from a different chain, The Muhadith who finds an unknown narrator in the chain of a Hadiths will consider that Hadith as weak and not fit to refer to as an evidence. But on the other hand if this unknown narrator’s identity is revealed and is seen to be a trustworthy narrator, the Hadith will be fit to use as evidence.  If a Muhadith sees that it is was not possible for one of the narrators to hear the Hadith from the previous narrators, then the Hadith will be classified as weak because there is an interruption in the chain, but if a Muhadith can prove that there is no interruption in the chain and that the narrations reached all the narrators then the Hadith is considered Hassan and is used as evidence.

I will mention to you some examples of the disputes of the Muhadiths as I explained above:

For example: Abu Dawood, Ahmad, Nasa’i, Ibn Majah and Tirmithi narrated from Abu Huraira (ra) that he said:

“A man asked the Prophet  and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah! We ride the sea and carry little water, if we use it for Wudu we will become thirsty, can we use the sea water for Wudu?’ He  said: ‘Its (sea) water is pure (Tahir) and its dead (animals) are permitted.’”

Tirmithi related that this Hadith is correct (Sahih) by Bukhari. Hakam Ibn Abd Al-Bar spoke of its correctness due to the acceptance of this Hadith by the scholars. Ibn al-Munthir said it is Sahih Hadith and Ibn Al-Aseer said in Sharh Al-Musnad: This Hadith is Sahih and Mashoor, extracted by the Imams in their books and they used it as evidence and its narrators are trustworthy. As-Shafi’i said that in the chain of the narrators of this Hadith, there is an unknown narrator to him. Ibn Daqiq Al-Eid mentioned the ways why this Hadith is not used as evidence; this includes the lack of information regarding Saeed Ibn Salama and Al-Mugheera Ibn Abi Barda who are mentioned in the chain of this Hadith, while these two narrators are known according to some Muhadiths. Abu Dawood said: Al-Mugheera is known, this is confirmed by Nasa’i. Al-Hafith said:  therefore from this it is incorrect someone claims that he is not identified and unknown. As for Saeed Ibn Salama, he followed Safwan Ibn Salim’s narration regarding Al-Julah Ibn Katheer.

Another example: Ahmad narrated from Saad Ibn Abi Waqas that he said:

“I heard the Prophet  enquiring about buying Tamr for Rutab (two forms of dates), He  asked those around him: ‘Does the Rutab (fresh date) shrink when it dries up?’ They said yes. He  prohibited that (action).”

This Hadith is Sahih by Bukhari, but was not accepted by a group including At-Tahawi, At-Tabari, Ibn Hazm and Abdul Haq, due to the presence of Zaid Ibn Ayash in its chain of narrators who is considered unknown. In the conclusion of the answer, he said that Ad-Dar-qitni said that he is a confirmed trustworthy (meaning Zaid Ibn Ayash), Al-Munthiri said: that two trustworthy narrators have narrated from him and they were accepted by Malik who is known for his extreme criticism.

Such Hadiths that are disputed in their classification as weak, they are the ones referred to by the Mujtahids or to their followings and witnesses that increase their strength, rendering them fit to be used as evidence. Note that not every weak Hadith is subject to search for its followings and witnesses to strengthen it or that it is subject for search to find if it was used by Mujtahids, there are weak Hadith that cannot be strengthened by anything, this is because the weak Hadith is divided into two types:

§  A type that is not used and is not strengthened by any followings and witnesses
§  A type that is strengthened by any followings and witnesses and is used by renowned Mujtahids and Faqihs

In our book, The Islamic Shakhsiyya, Volume I, it mentions the following:

“…It is incorrect to say that the weak Hadith if it comes from different weak chains it becomes Hassan or Sahih. If the Hadith is weak because of the corruption of its narrator or for being accused of actual lying and if it comes from other narration of such nature, this adds weakness to its weakness…” It also states: “Hassan Hadith is the Hadith whose extractor is known and its narrators are famous and does not contradict most of the Hadiths and it is what is accepted by most scholars and is used by most Faqihs, i.e. that its Sanad (chain of transmission) does not contain any one accused of lying and it must not be an odd Hadith. It is of two types: the first: The Hadith that its narrators are not free of any unknown whose is not eligible, but he must not be unaware and full of mistakes and must not be accused of fabrication. And the Matn (text) of the Hadith must have a similar narration from another chain, this will ensure that it is not odd or strange End of quote. This type in origin is weak but because it has witnesses and followings it is considered Hassan. This is what the scholars of Hadith say, in the book, Al Muqadimah by Ibn As-Salah who is one of the most famous scholars in Hadith science, it states:

***Not every weakness in a Hadith is removed when it comes from different chains, but this differs: the weakness that is not removed in such a way, due to the extent of the weakness and the end of the tyrant’s oppression and his resistance. This is like the weakness that originates because the narrator is accused of lying or that the Hadith is odd… and there is weakness removable by that, such as it being originating from a weakness in the memorization of the narrator, while he is of the people of truth and Deen. If we see that the narration that he brings from another chain, then we know it is due to his memorization and that his accuracy is not compromised.

It is clear to me that Hassan Sahih is of two types:

First: The Hadith that its narrators are not free of any unknown whose is not eligible, but he must not be unaware and full of mistakes and must not be accused of lying about the Hadith, i.e. that he did not show deliberate lying about the Hadith or any other corrupt reason and the Matn (text) of the Hadith also is known, through another similar narration or the same from different chain or chains, until it is linked to the following of the one who is following a similar narration or with that which have a witness to, which is the narration of another similar Hadith, which clears it from being odd and strange…) End quote. Here you see that this Hadith is weak in origin is considered as Hassan if a similar Hadith from another chain or is linked to the following or has a witnesses…etc.

And so, if a Hadith is said to be weak among some of the Muhadiths, it is not sufficient to discard it and not to use it as evidence, but the reasons for its classification as weak will be researched and whether the Mujtahids and renowned Faqihs and whether there are witnesses and followings that strengthen it or not. And whether it is classified by all Muhadiths? Or that they have disputed in the reason for classifying it as weak…and after studying all of that a decision will be taken whether to use the Hadith as evidence or not and so on. This is the basis we followed with regards to the Hadith:

“My companions are like the stars; by each whom you follow you will be guided.”

Because of the following:

This Hadith is narrated in more than one chain, each has been commented on and the strongest is the narration by Jabir (ra) which is:

Abu Umar Yusuf an-Nimry Al-Qurtubi (died in 463 AH) has extracted in his book, Jami’ Bayan Al-Ilm Wa Fadhluh, he said:

Ahmad Bin Ummar told us and said: he praised Ali Bin Umar and praised Al-Qadi Ahmad Bin Kamil and praised Abdullah Bin Rawah and praised Salam Bin Sulaim and praised Al-Harith Bin Ghusain, from Al-Amash, from Abi Sufyan, from Jabir that he said: the Prophet said:

“My companions are like the stars; by each whom you follow you will be guided.”

Abu Umar said: “This is a chain that is not accepted as evidence, because Al-Harith Bin Ghusain is unknown”.

But Ibn Hazm knew him and said that he is Abu Wahab Athaqafi and Bukhari also knew him and mentioned him in At-Tarikh Al-Kabeer, Al-Hafith Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani followed him in Al-Amali Al-Mutlaqa, he said: Ibn Haban mentioned him as one of the trustworthy, so it cannot be that he is unknown.

So it is a weak Hadith according to those who considered Al Harith Bin Ghusain as an unknown, as mentioned by Ibn Abdul Bir. But the Hadith is considered as fit to be used as evidence by those who knew Al Harith Bin Ghusain and considered him as trustworthy.

Therefore the Muhadiths did not agree on the classification of this Hadith as weak, so if this Hadith is found among renowned Mujtahids and Faqihs, it will be fit to be used as evidence. Because there is no consensus that it is weak by the Scholars of Hadith, this is followed by the renowned Mujtahids and Faqihs, so it is used as evidence with reassurance.

I will mention to you some of the renowned Mujtahids and Faqihs who used this Hadith as evidence:

Muhammad Bin Ahmad Shams Al-A’ima As-Surkhasi (died 483 AH) who used it as an evidence in his book Al-Mabsoot regarding the subject of Judiciary.

Abu Al-Abbas Shihab Ad-Deen known as Al-Qarafi (died 684 AH) in his book Az-Zakhira in his study of the Usul of Malik, also referred to by Abu Al Hassan Ali Bin Muhammad known as Al-Mawardi (died 450 AH) in his book Al-Hawi Al-Kabeer in his study of the Sahabah, Abu Muhammad Muwafaq ad-Deen known as Ibn Qudama Al-Maqdasi (died 620 AH) in his book Al-Mughni in the chapter: “The Sixth Chapter: The Reward of what was a Hunting Animal and the Similar Blessing”.

As you can see the Hadith is used by renowned Mujtahids and Faqihs, this is why it is considered as Hassan.

This is only for the issue related to Hadith that is disputed as weak by the Muhadiths not the Hadith that is agreed by all as weak. This latter one would not be considered if it was mentioned as weak in the books of the renowned Mujtahids or Faqihs, even if we assume that it is mentioned there for the sake of argument, it will still be weak and I say “for the sake of argument”  because the renowned Mujtahids or Faqihs do not use the weak Hadith that is agreed upon that it is weak.

I hope that this subject is completely clear to you my dear brother.


Your brother

Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah

6 Safar, 1438 AH
6. 11. 2016 CE