9.10.13

Muslim Families Faced Anguish in their Eid Celebrations Due to the Flawed Economic Development Policy of Capitalist Governments


This year, up to a week after Eid ul Fitri, 719 people were reported to have died, 1184 seriously injured, and 4326 people slightly injured, due to 3279 transportation accidents during the Eid's exodus flow of people in Indonesia travelling to visit their families for the celebration. Each year, in this, the largest Muslim country in the world, around 40 million residents of big cities in Indonesia make an annual homecoming (locally known as "mudik") heading to their hometowns by various modes of transportation. This phenomenon is not much different from other Muslim countries, although the volumes of migration are different. In Bangladesh, for example, the third largest Muslim country after Indonesia and Pakistan, more than 12 million Bangladeshi Muslims leave the city of Dhaka for the villages every year at the time of Eid ul Fitri. At the same time, Bangladesh experiences a high rate of ferry accidents due to poor ship quality and the number of passengers travelling on them in excess of capacity.

Muslim families in various countries, especially in Indonesia, have a strong annual tradition of visiting and spending time with their families during the Eid celebration, which originates from the Islamic understanding, as expressed by Rasulllah (saw);

"Visit each other [for a short visit] sometimes and love will increase" (Tabarani, Al-Baihaqi)

Unfortunately, this good tradition costs hundreds of lives each year, caused by the capitalistic economic policies of governments in the Muslim countries. The phenomenon of huge traffic accidents is actually an indication of 'a clear economic gap' between rural and urban areas, as well as a 'clear evidence' of the incompetence of Muslim regimes in investing in the development of people-oriented infrastructure.

The Poor Development Vision of Capitalist States in Securing Welfare for Its People

In the context of this homecoming phenomenon, there are two strong indications that clearly show that the governments of Muslim countries do not have any strong vision to seriously secure the welfare of their people:

1.       Development Gaps between Urban and Rural Areas

The Capitalistic development model is only growth-oriented, therefore more economic investment is geared to serve the urban areas that have a relatively rapid growth. Moreover, developing countries like Indonesia that always swallow the doctrine of the capitalism economy, only concentrate economic development on the industrial sector that requires expensive investment in order to pursue growth. As a result, other sectors such as agriculture, are abandoned and eventually the development itself is concentrated in the cities, without considering the concept of area planning based on the distribution of welfare for the people in all areas of the country – urban and rural alike. A ridiculous paradox is present in the fact that despite this poor distribution of welfare affecting many parts of the state, the Indonesian authorities are still considered to have made a great achievement in the past decade simply due to being one of the top three countries with the best economic growth in the world. However, almost 90 percent of the villages are poor, and the economic gap between the rural and the urban areas has continued to widen, alongside increasing poverty levels in many parts of the country. Ironic!

2.      The Lack of State Investment in the Development of Transportation Infrastructure

In the view of the capitalist in the provision of public services such as transportation, the state only serves as a facilitator, while the operator or executor is left to the market mechanisms, in other words, managed by the private sector. As a consequence, the price of public transportation tickets is expensive but the service is not good. In order to pursue profit, it is not uncommon that forms of public transportations that are not roadworthy and prone to accidents remain in operation, ignoring the safety of passengers. For the reason of limited funds, the infrastructure is left neglected, while thousands of kilometers of damaged roads, many full of dangerous pot-holes have been left without repair for many years. Hence this principle of economic development that relies on the private sector, is an invitation to the economic imperialism of Muslim lands, for it allows foreign corporations to control all strategic investments including natural resources in the name of 'aiding investment and development' in states. Hence the Muslims would be colonized in their own country.

The Impact of Capitalistic Development on Muslim Families

The homecoming tradition in Indonesia and Bangladesh in itself is actually a reflection of economic inequality and mass poverty caused by capitalism and its flawed development philosophy and policies which have inevitably impacted the institution of the Muslim family. Many Muslim families are forced economically to live in the urban areas, struggling to meet their needs while also being separated from their big families in other parts of the country. This phenomenon occurs systemically because life facilities and employment opportunities are concentrated in big cities, therefore most people have to travel far away from their families to meet the needs of daily life, often risking their lives just to meet their basic needs, or are even forced to migrate hundreds of kilometers away, leaving their family just to earn crumbs.

The migration from rural to urban areas, from one area to another, as well as migration across national borders of a country in the context of the growing "global cities" or new urban areas, or buffer areas to support the rapid industrial urbanization; are all characteristic of capitalistic development. All this would definitely cause a significant adverse impact on the structure of the Muslim families in the Muslim countries, which is a natural consequence of Capitalism which inherently puts liberal materialistic values over the harmony of family units in society.

Among the effects are: First, it separates family members from their family; and the most crucial is if the children are separated from their mother. It is reflected on the forms of urban families where the husband and wife work in the big city while the children live with grandparents or relatives in the village. The most frightening consequence is the destruction of future generations, because instead of attention being placed on the upbringing of their children, the focus of the mothers is on their job that often demands them to be separated from their children. Second, it weakens the institution of Muslim marriages and families as seen from the increasing numbers of divorce, the shifting role of the mother into breadwinner, the phenomenon of husband and wife living separately, the high rate of single parent families, and so on.

The Economic Development Principles of the Khilafah: Strengthens the Family Structure

Islam is diametrically different from the capitalist ideology. Islam as an ideology strongly rejects the values of materialism and hedonism that come from the point of view of Capitalism. The true Islamic society under the Khilafah system is built purely upon Islam that has a primary focus on the implementation of God's laws, as according to the Words of Allah (swt):

"I only created jinn and man to worship Me." (Adh-Dhaariyat: 56)

Islam builds its society upon the foundation of the Islamic Aqeedah. Its view of the purpose of life is to obey the Commandments of Allah and avoid His prohibitions, and its view of happiness is seeking the Pleasure of Allah (swt). The Islamic value system creates a distinctive identity in the community, which defines the status of people upon their taqwa, and not their wealth or any other physical attributes.

Islam also stands in stark contrast to the capitalist system that curbs the role of the state and emphasizes the role of the market. Islam is precisely the opposite. The state has a major and vital role in Islam in taking care of the needs of the people. Its main task is to serve and take care of the needs of every citizen, protect the vulnerable, and prevent any injustice. The Prophet (saw) said:

"An Imam is a shepherd (ra'in) and he is responsible for those in his care."

The Khilafah is a state which implements a sound economic system that rejects the flawed capitalist interest-based financial model, bans hoarding of wealth, and prohibits the privatization of natural resources as well as foreign party heavy investment in the development of infrastructure, agriculture, industry and technology. The foundation of its policies are directed to seeking an effective distribution of wealth in order to secure the basic needs of all citizens, and at the same time it is committed to ensuring the equitable and affordable economic development in all its territories, so that people do not need travel far just to meet their basic needs.

The blessed, just and prosperous economic development is on the shoulders of the Khalifah. However this development policy of the state is shaped upon the Islamic Shariah which determines the purpose of economic development in the Islamic Khilafah, which are:

1.  Securing the shar'i rights of the people, i.e. protecting religion, life, honor, mind and property which are considered as adh-Dharuriyat al-Khamsu (five emergency matters) in human life. So if the development policy runs contrary to or undermines the religion, life, honor, mind and property of the people, then each violation is considered a crime that should be punished by the established Shariah Law, according to the type of violation.

2.   Establishing Islamic societies. Related to this, if the development policy harms or destroys the Islamic thoughts and feelings of the society, including damaging or harming the Muslim family structure in the society, then the policy is contrary to Islamic Shariah and declared as flawed and unacceptable economic development.

3.      Realizing the individual prosperity of the people. Indicators of prosperity in Islam is first ensuring fulfillment of the basic needs of individuals, so if there is one person alone who does not have their basic needs met, then the economic development policy would not be considered a success. Unlike under capitalism, it is not necessary to have millions of poor people before considering the economic development of a country a failure.

As a consequence, the Muslim family structure is maintained and the religion, life, honor, reason and property of the people is protected. Masha Allah!

The Khilafah state is Responsible for the Strategic Infrastructure Investment

Imagine the mentality of a great leader like Umar bin Al-Khattab who stated: "I am the Amir Al Muuminin, and I am afraid that if a donkey trips on the road in Iraq, Allah will ask me why I didn't fix the road for the donkey". Such a mindset underlies the Khilafah's policy in carrying out its strategic infrastructure investment, which can be explained in the following 3 principle points (as written by Dr. Fahmi Amhar in the Homecoming Technology of the Khilafah):

1.      Firstly, the principle that infrastructure development is the responsibility of the state and should not be handed over to private investors.

2.  Secondly, the principle that good development planning in the regions will reduce transport needs. When Baghdad was built as the capital city, every part of the city was planned only for a certain population, and there were adequate mosques, schools, libraries, parks, a wheat industry, and a commercial area for the people, in addition to stopovers for the wayfarers, and even separate public baths for men and women. Most citizens within the Khilafah should not need to travel far to meet their daily needs as well as to study or work, because all the necessary facilities for life should be within a reasonable range of travel distance, and the standard of quality of all such facilities should be of good.

3.   Thirdly, the state should build public infrastructure using the latest technological standards in for example navigation technology, telecommunications, physical road management, up to the transportation equipment itself. Here are some historical examples of how the Khilafah seriously invested in the cutting-edge technologies of the time:

§     Navigation is absolutely necessary to ensure safe travel, and avoiding getting lost. For that purpose the Muslims learned astronomy and compass engineering in China, and developed the science of mapping. Hundreds of geographers explored all corners of the world and made a reportage of unique countries. As a result, the hajj journey and also travel for trade - both on land and sea - became more secure.

§      Technology related to physical road management was also not left behind. Since 950, the roads were paved in Cordoba, regularly cleaned of dirt, and oil lamps lit in the night. Two hundred years later, i.e. in 1185, Paris became the first European city that mimicked Cordoba.

§     Interestingly, until the 19th century the Khilafah Uthmani was still consistent in developing the transportation infrastructure. When railway technologies were founded in Germany, the Khalifah immediately made the decision to build a railway line, with the main purpose to facilitate the Hajj pilgrimage. Hajj is the season that involves the ritual of the largest movement of Muslims across the world, both to go on the pilgrimage to Mecca and the hajis journey back home to their hometowns. Therefore there is an exodus of people travelling during this season. In 1900, the Khalifah Sultan Abdul Hamid II announced the project "Hejaz Railway". This rail line stretched from Istanbul, the capital of the caliphate to Makkah, passing through Damascus, Jerusalem and Medina. The result of this project is that travel from Istanbul to Makkah which was initially 40 days, was cut to 5 days. Mashallah!

Thus, the Khilafah will provide a comprehensive guarantee of a blessed, equitable, and prosperous economic development which will minimize inequality and destruction in the society and at the same time strengthen the Muslims' family structure, also benefitting the people. The Khilafah will also provide the safe and adequate transportation infrastructure with advanced technology so that thousands of Muslims will Insha Allah no longer be victims of transportation accidents due to neglectful governance.


Or,

See this Link:

Q&A: The Hukm of the Haram money after Taubah (Repentance)

Question:

To the Scholar Ata Ibn Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah, may Allah Protect you. As-Salaamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullah:

What is the Hukm (Islamic ruling) concerning the Haram money after Taubah like the money that has come by means of interest, stealing, vulgar singing, or other than that?
Is their specification or is the Hukm singular?

And if the money was Haram and even if the one who possessed it had sought repentance (Taubah) there could be a person that wishes to make Taubah but fears the loss of his wealth... So is there in this an exception so that his Taubah is coveted like some of the Sheikhs have stated?

From Tamir Al-Hajj Muhammad

Answer:

Wa Alaikumu Assallam Wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakaatuhu

Allah (swt) says:

"O you who have believed, repent to Allah with sincere repentance."

And He (swt) has said:

"Except for those who make Taubah (repentance) and correct and hold fast to Allah and make their Deen purely for Allah, then those who do this are with the believers and Allah will provide the believers with a great reward."

At-Tirmidhi extracted a Hadith narrated by Anas Bin Malik (ra) from the Prophet (saw):

"Every son of Adam errs (sins) and the best of those who sin are those who repent."

And in order for the Taubah to be valid and for Allah (swt) to forgive the one who repents his sin, then it is obligatory for the one repenting to remove himself from the sinful act of disobedience, and regret disobeying Him (swt) in this act that he had done in the past and resolve a decisive firm determination to never return to the like of that act.

And if that act of disobedience was connected to the right of another person then it is a condition to return that unjust act to its people or receive exoneration from them. So if he has property (wealth) that he has taken from them by stealing or illegitimate usurpation then it is obligatory to return the property to its rightful owner and to rid of this unlawful gain according to the Shar'i manner. This is because acquiring funds (property, wealth) through Haram means carries severe consequences. Ahmad extracted a Hadith narrated by Abdullah Ibn Masoud (ra) that the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: "And a servant does not acquire money from Haram except that it would be a provision for him in the fire."

At-Tirmidhi extracted from Ka'ab Bin Ujrah narrated that the Messenger of Allah (saw) said:

"O Ka'ab no morsel (i.e. anything) that comes by way of Suht (illicit money) brings profit except that that the fire has more right to it."

So how does this person you ask about want to repent while he retain the Haram money in his possession?! This is not Taubah but rather this is a continuation of the bad. So I advise him to make Taubah and rid himself from the Haram gain in accordance to the Shar'a (Islamic Law). And to return the Haram money that he stole or usurped to its rightful owners, requests their pardon and seeks forgiveness from Allah firstly and lastly. Allah (swt) is Ar-Razzaaq (the One who provides all sustenance) and Possessor of the Insurmountable Power (Al-Quwwah Al-Mateen) and if He (swt) Wills to compensate him with wholesome and blessed wealth which He will honour him with in this life and the next. And Allah (swt) loves the Taubah of His slave if he is truthful and sincere. He will reward him with the fullest of reward.

I ask Allah (swt) to guide this man to the rightly guided course in this matter so that he makes seeks repentance sincerely and Allah (swt) is the most giving in His Forgiveness.


Or,

See this Link:

Calamities of the Western Civilization - Homelessness

100 million people in the world are homeless, and the vast majority of these are from the capitalist democracies. Whether large or small, rich or poor, the democracies of the world do not ensure that their own citizens have a house to sleep in.

Three quarters of all the world's homeless people come from India, which is the world's largest democracy. Though poverty is considered the major cause of homelessness, India does not lack wealth: its 100 richest people have a net worth of $250 billion and according to Forbes, March 2013, the 22nd richest person in the world, Mukesh Ambani, comes from India. In 2012 he built the most expensive home on the planet at a cost of $1 billion. Calling it 'Antilia', it measures 174 metres tall and has a floor space greater than Louis XIV's palace at Versailles, France. According to the preachers of capitalist free market economics, the generation of wealth will trickle down from the rich to the poor, but while this may be true for the 600 person staff needed to run Mukesh Ambani's home, it is difficult to imagine how this concentration of wealth will trickle down to the rest of India's 1.24 billion people.

Turning to the US, which considers itself the leader of the 'Free World', we also find the problem of homelessness; in summer and winter, rain and shine, begging for food and sleeping in cardboard boxes they line the streets of America. In any given year, 1% of America's population experiences homelessness and 10% of these are considered chronically homeless. Latest statistics from a report in 2013 showed that 633,782 Americans were without a home.

Australia's 2006 census revealed that 105,000 of its 20 million populations did not have a home. Canada has 200,000 who experienced homelessness at some point last year according to a recent report: 'The State of Homelessness in Canada 2013', with 30,000 homeless on any given night. As for Europe, there are 3 million homeless people. One of them according to La Stampa newspaper, Domenico Codispoti, was even sentenced by an Italian court to 'house arrest', but as he has no house, the police come and check on him every night to see that he sleeps on the same piece of pavement in Milan until his sentence ends in April 2014!

The Guardian reported in June 2013 that 6,437 people were sleeping on the streets of London. William Booth described a scene of London's homeless people two centuries ago in 1890 that will be familiar to any 21st century visitor to London: "There are still a large number of Londoners ... who find themselves at nightfall destitute. These now betake themselves to the seats under the plane trees on the Embankment... Here on the stone abutments, which afford a slight protection from the biting wind, are scores of men lying side by side, huddled together for warmth, and of course, without any other covering than their ordinary clothing."

Western sociologists and economists try and explain the causes of homelessness: poverty, mental illness, disability, unemployment, alcoholism, drug abuse, domestic violence and so on. Western politicians promise to solve the problem with new initiatives aimed at tackling the causes, but after hundreds of years of human misery no one should believe them.

Western civilization failed to guarantee housing for all citizens and follows a flawed ideology, which claims that application of theoretical principles to address 'causes' of problems might relieve problems such as homelessness, and when 'action plans' and 'new initiatives' fail it is then assumed that the causes were not properly understood. However, the fundamental problem lies elsewhere. Western civilization separates real people and their problems from the help they need by relying on social or economic policies to come to the rescue. Furthermore, democracy has sanctified intangible freedoms at the expense of the most basic of human material rights. In defence of freedom, the US, for example, can commit hundreds of billions of dollars to military interventions in far away countries, even if freedom brings death and destruction to those that are being made 'free'. At the same time, the US federal government can sit idly waiting for her starving and homeless citizens to fend for themselves and what governmental funds are directed to the problems are too few and are directed towards theoretical cause’s more than material realities.

Islam, on the other hand insists upon actual provision of material solutions to those living under the protection of the Khilafah State that implements Islam. The Prophet Muhammad (saw) addressed three basic and undeniable rights of man including the right of shelter:

"The Son of Adam has no better right than that he would have a house wherein he may live, a piece of clothing whereby he may hide his nakedness and a piece of bread and some water." [Tirmidhi]

In Islamic jurisprudence this means every man, now, today, must have these rights met! However, the Khilafah state has been absent from the world for 89 years, and the Muslims who had lived under its shade for fourteen centuries have been subjugated to the Western colonial powers and rulers who serve their interests ever since the Khilafah's destruction. This is the calamity of the Muslim world, and yet, despite fragmentation, occupation of lands and of course poverty, one anomaly remains: homelessness is rare.

One interesting case may highlight the point. If India is the world's biggest democracy and the US is the world's leading democracy, then Israel is the Middle East's first democracy. Built upon the destruction of Palestinian homes, and the massive expropriations of Palestinian lands for Jewish settlements, Israel has a homelessness problem, but walking along Tel Aviv's streets it is Jews, not Arabs that are sleeping in the cardboard boxes. For Palestinians from the West Bank or Gaza, getting a travel permit to work in Israel will bring them face to face for the first time with the phenomenon of people much richer than themselves leaving their fellow citizens to sleep on the streets at night like in any other Western city.

The calamity of homelessness, it seems, is one of the defining features of Western civilization, and one of the bitter prices paid for the delusion of freedom, wherein the weak must sacrifice their material wellbeing for the benefit of the strong. In the West, freedom means the freedom to be able to fail, and to suffer a life of great hardship, alone and destitute in the streets of the worlds' richest and busiest cities.

Or,

See this Link:


Q&A: The One Who Eats Ribaa (Usury)

Question:

Assalaamu Alaikum

If you permit I would like to ask about the one who commits the act of Ribaa (usury) and if he will be in the fires of Hell forever? It relates to the Tafseer of Aayah 275 as found in the book At-Tayseer Fee Usool At-Tafseer. Thank you Brother.

From Adi Victoria from the Indonesian town of Samarinda.

Answer:

Wa Alaikumu Assalaam Wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakaatuhu

There are two kinds of people who deal with Ribaa (usury):

First: The kind who believes that Ribaa is Haram and despite this still deals with Ribaa. So this is someone who commits a major sin. He receives a punishment in this life from the Khilafah state and if he is not punished with the Shari'ah punishment in this life then he will have the punishment of the Hereafter and so he will enter the fire but not forever as long as he did not make the Ribaa as halal. So this is the case where he believes that Ribaa is Haraam but still perpetrated that act of disobedience (Ma'siyah). And the one who is 'Aasiy (disobedient) and dies upon Islam then he will not abide in the fire forever due to the saying of the Messenger (saw) in a Hadeeth that is Muttafaq Alaihi (agreed upon) related by Anas Bin Maalik who said that the Prophet (saw) said:

"The one who says: Laa Ilaahah Illallah will be taken out of the fire..."

So this means that he will not abide in it forever.

Second: The one who makes Ribaa Halaal i.e. he states that Ribaa is Halaal and then dies upon this. This kind is a Kaffir (disbeliever) because he has denied that which must be known from the Deen by necessity. Ribaa is Haram in the Quran Al-Kareem by Qat'iyah (definite) Ayat, Qat'iyah Ath-Thuboot (definite in transmission) and Qat'yah Ad-Dalaalah (definite in meaning). So whoever makes Ribaa Halal and dies upon that then he is a disbeliever and this kind will abide in the fire forever. So this is the case of the one who used to deal with Ribaa and deny that Ribaa was Haram. He therefore dies upon disbelief and will stay in the fire (Hell) forever.

The evidence for this is the speech of Allah (swt) in Ayah 275 of Surah Al-Baqarah:

"Those who eat Ribaa (usury) will not stand (on the Day of Resurrection) except like the standing of a person beaten by Shaitaan (Satan) leading Him to insanity. That is because they say: "Trading is only like Ribaa (usury)," whereas Allah has made trading Halaal and made Ribaa (usury) Haraam. So whosoever receives an admonition from his Lord and stops eating Ribaa (usury) shall not be punished for the past; his case is for Allah (to judge); but whoever returns [to Ribaa (usury)], such are the dwellers of the Fire - they will abide therein forever."

So the last part of the Ayah came commenting upon those:

'They say: Trading is only like Ribaa'.

This means that they made Ribaa Halal like trade and they disbelieved in the speech of Allah of Allah (swt):

'And Allah has made trading Halaal and made Ribaa Haraam'.

So those whom it reaches that Ribaa is Haram and not Halal and then they believe in this, make Taubah (repentance) and leaving their dealings with Ribaa and they find their capital sums sufficient then Allah (swt) will forgive them by His Favour and Forbearance that which occurred in the past. If however they insist upon Ribaa being Halal and continue to deal with it whilst denying and rejecting the speech of Allah (swt):

"And Allah has made trading Halaal and made Ribaa Haraam"

and then die upon that, then they will be from those who the speech of Allah applies upon:

"Such are the dwellers of the Fire - they will abide therein forever."

The following is the summary of what is understood from the Shari’ah texts:

1.      That the one who perpetrates the act of dealing with Ribaa whilst believing that it is Haram, then this person is 'Aasiy (disobedient) and Faasiq (rebellious to Allah's Commands). If he dies upon Islam then he will not abide in the Hell fire forever but rather he will be punished in it for as long as Allah wishes and then is removed from the fire by His Permission, Subhaanahu.

2.      The one who perpetrates the act of dealing with Ribaa whilst denying that it is Haram meaning that he has made it Halal for himself. If he then dies upon that then he would have died upon disbelief (Kufr) and spend eternity in the fire.

Allah has made us from amongst the truthful believers who make Haram that which Allah has made Haram and make Halal that which Allah has made Halal. Those who abide by the Ahkam Ash-Shari’ah as they have come, those whom Allah has honoured with Islam in this life and as a result he grants them victory over their enemies and honours them with Islam in the Hereafter by admitting them into His (swt)'s Jannah and raising them amongst the Prophets, truthful, martyrs and righteous. And how good a company these will be to be with.


Or,

See this Link: